The card says, "You GET GET +1 skill value for this evasion." However, in the arkhamdb text to the left, it says, "You GET +1 skill value for this evasion." Is the arkhamdb text the official errata? I prefer to get get twice if the designers are crazy enough to let us do it. Why get when you can get get?

If I draw this card as effect of a Symbol (e.g.: George Barnaby's Elder Sign) during step 4 of a Skill Check, do I interrupt the skill check and take the action from Crossroads? Among other things I would not put the drawn chaos token back into the bag?

I got this for Bob Jenkins and it was crushing! Rogues are not good at healing damage and lvl 0 survivor can't do much better than Bandages, which doesn't even heal by itself (you need to find a way to take some damage first) but still better than Painkillers.

I think spending 2 actions to get rid of a weakness is way better than dedicating precious slots in your deck to counter it, specially if that card is not even good.

How does this card interact with Elusive -monster keyword?

1. The monster attack is considered "effect" and the whole attack is canceled (so it never even started) and elusive doesn't trigger.

OR

2. The cancel part of the card only targets the effects of the attack. So the attack is considered started. There are no effects but Elusive triggers.

For a non-Hunter, particularly brutal:

Cluever gets mugged → Luke yanks the monster into the next room → gets ~3 resources → vanishes into another dimension → monster stands there doing nothing.

Testless enemy disposal for one action.